INTRODUCTION

Firstly I want to say, I do not consider myself a dissident, nor do I identify with the term that the mainstream has coined because of some very logial questions... denialist. My position is that we need to "Rethink" AIDS. We need to allow doctors and researchers to use the scientific process to validate that things do or don't add up, as there are a substantial number of credentialled professionals that essentially have some very important questions regarding the current hypothesis and its validity. I have never used the heresay of personal opinion, nor have I solely relied on dissident science to come to the conclusions I have about the HIV/AIDS establishment.

My feelings are based on taking my questions to the most qualified databases, those of the NIH, NLM, Pub Med, etc.

The amount of research available that more than validates many of the perspectives of those in the dissident movement is staggering. Today there is study after study of the dangers of ARVS. Its shocking to discover that the slowing down of the mitochondria is the sign of all degenerative diseases, whilst discovering that these drugs intentionally slow down the mitochondria. Then I think to myself no wonder some of these mad conspiracy theorists are screaming genocide at the drug makers. If a drug causes the ailments it claims to cure, well that is not a conspiracy now is it. Research the cause of degenerative diseases, and the functions of the drugs, and see for yourself.

Many studies show that children are damaged by these ARV's in the womb. That they manipulate the DNA and the mitochondria which I could easily say are two of the most important building blocks of life. The results of this damage are unseen to the naked eye but can eventually lead to serious nuerological disorders, other health issues, and death. Investigate "Persistent mitochondiral DNA damage in children exposed to ARVS."

There is also a study by the renowned Johns Hopkins University, that shows circumcision does not lower the chance of transmission and might possibly increase it slightly. (This same study also showed that the rate of sexual trasmission was also rather low considering the number of patients used)

Another wonderful study by them showed children who recieved breastmilk by their HIV+ mothers are less likely to be terminal, are less likely to seroconvert, and are more likely to have a healthy life. (This study was done in Africa like many others on over 9,000 women.)

Diverting women from breastfeeding in Africa was about the most horrendous mistake that could be made, as a formula program is practically impossible for people already drinking from contaminated water and who have no income. Many of these children I am sure were poisoned or starved to death and written off as pediatric AIDS deaths. Though the most interesting part of this study showed that formula feeding reduced the thickness of the stomach lining making children MORE prone to seroconverting to HIV because the illedged virus could enter the body more readily in this manner.

Are you also aware that there are 80 different illnesses that cross react on HIV tests. Illnesses with their own health difficulties that do not get treated or addressed upon HIV diagnosis. To top that if you happen to have one of the many AIDS defining illnesses that are also cross reactive on HIV tests, once again the real issue is left untreated and you are given the toxic treatement of ARVS. Some people find some relief when ARVS are administered if they happen to have one of the diseases that ARVS can assist. (Only some are viral which is probably why it has been said by renowned researchers at UCSF that only 35% of patients benefit) ARVS are known to kill certain fungal infections, bacteria, virus, and so forth, but the long term use eventually begins to kill and damage all cells and therefore leading to other causes of death like Liver failure that is not and AIDS defining illness but a byproduct of ARV use. If you happen to have one of the illnesses that are not affected by ARVS you are basically being misdiagnosed and the real health issue is being ignored. Which is the sad truth about the misdiagnosis that is HIV/AIDS. In a study where they put several non-positive people on HAART for 30 days every single participant showed Mitochondrial DNA damage. This is something that was once blamed on HIV/AIDS but is now clearly being seen as a bi-product of ARV use.

Now what if you are a perfectly healthy person who has been diagnosed HIV positive. It is impossible to escape the onslought of stress, depression, fear, anxiety, shame, and all the other toxic emotions that have great potential to affect a persons health. Not to mention being told you are essentially dying when in reality you feel fine and very well could be fine. All those toxic emotions have been verified to cause immunosuppression and illness. In the instance your immunity is down you begin to become susceptible to all kinds of things and all these little things become undeniable aspects of your impending death. This is an extremely horrible place to be. I have been there. Some of us like myself have chosen to embrace our health in spite of the diagnosis that doesn't seem to fit the bill. And now years later my life is normal outside of the stigma and changes caused by being leperized by this misdiagnosis.

I know AIDS patients also who have been going strong never ill, some even without viral load all with T-Cells below 200. What does that say:

HIV/AIDS is a misdiagnosis. We desperately need to RETHINK AIDS. We need to stop categorizing a bunch of illnesses together which essentially endangers patients by treating them all the same way. Every patient is dramatically different. This Virus affects no one the same way. The Defining illnesses are not contracted nor transmitted in the same way... So truly how can anyone say that one virus in the cause for so many dramatically different outcomes. We are dealing with a serious case of misdiagnosis when the hypothesis that we live by is a misdiagnosis in and of itself.